Aris: Eight former players of “Zero” demand the team’s expulsion from the league!

Eight former Aris footballers demand the expulsion of the “yellow” from the Super League Stockman with a complaint to the European Patent Office!

Specifically, eight former football players. Marsfile a complaint with European Patent Officeand through it they demand the expulsion of the Thessaloniki team from the league. Premier League Stokesman.

Yes, It is not required to obtain approval from EIP/EPOTransfers and new sports ID cards for professional footballers, citing debts and court orders.

While reporting If the application is not accepted by European Patent OfficeThey will report it. FIFA They will appeal to the civil courts!

His complaint regarding the order, which was shared with multiple recipients, states:

“to

1. Executive Committee of the European Patent Office,
2. European Patent Office Committee for Emergency Cases,
3. European Patent Office Football Players Qualification Committee.

Contact:
1. The European Patent Office Professional Football Committee,
2. European Court of Arbitration for Football,
3. Licensing Department at the European Patent Office,
4. Professional Sports Committee of the General Assembly,
5. Super League 1,
6. Basab

AITISH – KATAGGELIA

1. To Efthymios Kolocheris,
2. Constantinos Capitanos,
3. Gregorio Papazacharia,
4. By Emmanuel Papastrianou,
5. Stylianos Tsoukani,
6. By Michael Kirgia,
7. By Ricardo Fati,
8. By Ronaldo Giaro,
All former professional footballers, KEP members,
Residents for Performance, Faveiro 47, Athens

K A T A

Sports Successor Football Joint Stock Company named “ATHLETIKOS SYLLOGOS THESSALONIKI O ARIS PAE” based in Thessaloniki and legally represented.

Mr. President – ​​Honorable Members,

As you know, we are former professional footballers of PAE ARIS, and we played for the team in the SUPER LEAGUE before we were relegated to amateur football.

Due to the breach of our contract, we appealed to your arbitration committees and, although we were acquitted, under the responsibility of the European Patent Office, we were unable to enforce their decisions.

Unfortunately, a number of our legal and external actions, which we have taken through our lawyers, have had the same fate.

But it seems that the divine trial conducted by Themis, the goddess of the round, has led both the FIFA Disciplinary Committee and the renewed “Football Areopagus”, the Areopagus Court of Arbitration for Sport, to restore justice and legitimacy to the long-suffering struggle zone of professional football.

In particular, these two football bodies, in a series of decisions, recognized the sporting succession and obliged Bay Aris, Iraklis, Panashaki, Aspropyrgos, Firoia, Ionikos, OFI, etc. to pay the obligations of the former Bay Football Club. Players S.

Regarding FIFA decisions, despite the non-compliance of the European Patent Office and its bodies, PAE ARIS and ASPROPYRGOS were forced to pay the salaries of football players after severe disciplinary sanctions were imposed, on the contrary regarding the decisions of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). Football EPO, PAE ARIS refuses to execute them.

For your full information, we refer you to the decisions of the European Patent Office (EPO) Court of Arbitration for Football (CAF) issued upon our requests, which did not accept our request for a points deduction, but accepted the following:

A. The new PAE (ARIS) is a sporty successor to the old PAE!

b. The new PAE (ARIS) company pays 50% statutory interest on the old PAE company’s debt and is obligated to pay the footballer!

C. The time limit for the period 2016-2017 of Article 111 of Law 2725 subsequently adopted by the Limit and Licensing Regulation does not prevent sports succession!

Because the trick of arbitrariness was invented by the professionals – thieves of the football system which unfortunately, under the tolerance of the previous administrations of the European Patent Office, was imposed on the majority of the Areopagites and the appeals of the previous formations of FIFA to serve the then favourite team. Bay.

Because following the amendment of 24.9.2023 to the EPO Licensing Regulations at the request of UEFA, in accordance with Articles 71-73, previous decisions of the ICC that recognised sporting succession, even if they were rejected as abusive, are essentially recognised as valid and enforceable requests for the imposition of sanctions.

Because the EIP/EPO in the case dedicated to the footballers of PAE AO KAVALA recommended us to appeal to the EPO Executive Committee and the Extraordinary Cases Committee to implement Article 66 paragraph 17 of the EPO Statutes.

Because many of our colleagues KONTOVAS-TRIANTAFYLLAKOS-WANGA-APOSTOLAKIS-MARA etc. have already been acquitted and received their earnings in Greece) and abroad SISTON, UBIDES etc., which constitutes an unacceptable unequal treatment for us, according to the CAS legislation!

Because the above-mentioned rationales for the grounds for the irrevocable arbitral awards of the ICC/EPO, according to the standing case law of the Supreme Court, produce a judgment and are binding on the PAE and the EPO!

Because the competent authority, the Licensing Department of the European Patent Office, despite our requests, complaints and declarations, refuses to implement the irrevocable ITC decisions and to implement the Licensing Regulation, unless we also issue a new ITC definition decision.

Since the IPC’s decision to declare PAE as the sporting successor is already ERGA OMNES, a new appeal to the IPC for the obvious order will simply burden us with new fees, fees, fees, while PAE will gain more time.

Because the fact that the IPC did not impose the disciplinary penalty of deducting three points, for the alleged misuse, does not mean in any way that the disciplinary sanctions provided for in your bylaws cannot be imposed by your statutory bodies against the non-compliant successor company GO!

Because according to Article 66, paragraph 17, regarding the income of your laws:
“Prior to the start of and participation in the competitions, all teams must fulfil all their obligations under the final decisions of the competent bodies of FIFA, the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne, the European Patent Office, the Football Players’ and Coaches’ Associations and other groups, the Inter-organisational Authorities and the European Patent Office.

Teams that have not met the above obligations are prohibited from being promoted to a higher category.

The European Patent Office may, by decision of the Emergency Cases Committee or the Executive Committee, revoke the validity of sports identity cards of players or associations that have not met the above obligations until they are in compliance.

Since our decisions invoked by the ICC have immediate binding effect, you must first order the withdrawal of the football player cards of the successor company PAE ARIS until it respects the decisions and meets our demands, and then, if it continues to fail to comply, ban the participation of the PAE ARIS team in the next tournament of the 2024-2025 season!

Because ARIS PAE must pay us at least 50% of the capital, interest and expenses, as follows:

1. To the first of us, the amount of 224,469 euros with legal interest, based on decisions 929/2011 of the PEEOD, 50/2014 of the TDD, and 143/2020 of the IDD,

2. For the second of us, the amount of 315,000 euros with legal interest, based on decisions 161/2013 of the PEEOD and 137/2020 of the IPC,

3. To our third party the sum of 79,646 euros with legal interest, based on decisions 298/2014 of the PEEOD and 138/2020 of the IDP,

4. To the fourth of us, the sum of 163,000 euros with legal interest, based on decisions 425/2014 issued by PEEOD and 129/2020 issued by IDP,

5. For our fifth, the sum of 20,560 euros with legal interest based on decisions 90/2015 of the PEEOD and 178/2021 of the IDP,

6. To the sixth of us the sum of 93,994 euros with legal interest based on decision 368/2015 of the PEEOD and 72/2021 of the IDP,

7. To the seventh of us, the sum of 834,450 euros with legal interest, based on decision 450/2012 of the PEEOD and decision 136/2020 of the ITP,

8. To the eighth of us, the sum of 300,000 euros with legal interest based on decisions 144/2013 of the PEEOD and 171/2023 of the IDP.

Because after notifying the out-of-court statement of 23 KEP members (including the first 3 of us) frankly, as a legal warning, we send you the last warning before we appeal to FIFA, reminding you that you will be found as defendants before the Disciplinary Committee after the sanction imposed on you in the DURMISAI case (which you could have avoided if the ICC had then accepted the additional intervention of our colleagues and upheld the EIP decision!).

For all these reasons

We ask you

1. Our current request should be presented as a matter of priority at the next meeting of the Executive Committee,

2. Implement without delay our decisions issued by PEEOD and the EPO Court of Arbitration for Football,

3. That the Licensing Directorate of the European Patent Office is required to implement it immediately in accordance with the International Licensing Regulations, without Greece inventing the new application for recognition of the sports succession,

4. Not to approve, through the EIP, the transfers and new sports identity cards of PAE ARIS professional footballers until the irrevocable decision of the European Court of Arbitration for Football is complied with,

5. Do not allow PAE ARIS to participate in the new SUPER LEAGUE 1 tournament, until it complies with the irrevocable decision of the ICC/EPO.
next to,

We declare that:

A: We will report you to the FIFA Disciplinary Committee to request disciplinary action by the European Patent Office as a matter of non-compliance with decisions and regulations.

b. We will seek legal protection from the competent civil and criminal courts.

Note: Please notify us via email to our lawyers of the decision that will be taken by the competent legal authorities.

Athens 8.8.2024

Lawyer Lawyer

Georgios P. Panagopoulos
Amadsa 14162,
47 Faveiro Street, Athens