Emmanuel Macron presents a plan to “lean” to the right, while his rival Marine Le Pen uses left-wing elements, although experts say he seeks old neoliberal recipes linked to the pure right, for example, when controlling inflation. -Wing.
It remains to be seen whether efforts to win the French presidency will be fruitful and who will win after the two votes in the first round. Although France still has 23.1 percent of the vote for the president and Le Pen, it is considered a historic vote for the French right.
A higher percentage of the vote, which was 25 percent, three percentage points higher than in the 2017 election, “reveals” the apparent lack of credibility. Of the 12 candidates put forward by 12,824,169 voters who did not support, those who did not come should add 543,609 blank votes and 247,151 zero votes.
In this way, the unspoken constituency represents 27 percent, a higher percentage than the candidate who received the most votes.
Today a large number of poor or discriminated people are guaranteed to abstain permanently from voting.
After all, there is discontent among young people in this second round because again they have to choose what they consider to be “less evil,” which already happened in the 2017 referendum, when he was president. Between the same rivals, around the tiebreaker, there was controversy.
“We are tired of having to vote for less than two, which explains the uprising. There is no Macrono or Le Penno,” a student from La Sorbonne told Reuters during a demonstration at the university gate a few days ago that none of the candidates should vote.
Those students would have voted for the left-wing candidate Mlenchon in the first round. But they can skip it now.
Experts also consider the influence gained in the first round of so-called “effective voting”, in which the voter does not deposit in favor of the candidate of his true sympathy, but deposits to the candidate of the party they consider. The chances of winning are a regular feature of French elections.
The online consultation conducted by the Mieux Voter Association after the first round demonstrates its weight in the desire to promote the voting system with the purpose of voting and, at the same time, the eligibility that people give to the candidate. Effective voting.
According to france24.com, when participants in the consultation were asked to pronounce themselves in the traditional manner, in addition, each candidate was asked to rate the rejected one from the best — the company encourages a “majority vote”. – Jean-Luc Mélenchon, who came in third in the first round with 22 percent of the 30,000 participants, scored 55.46 percent. Macron has 14.38 percent.
It is unknown at this time what he will do after leaving the post.
Polls range from 51 percent to 54 percent in favor of Macron, with Le Pen suggesting a spectrum range of 49 percent to 46 percent.
One and the other tried at all costs to get the votes deposited in the first round in favor of the remaining ten candidates; Importantly, Mலlenchon (France not included), third on the first-round list with 22 percent. The fate of the votes of his supporters is considered important today.
Recent polls show that 38 percent of the votes cast in his favor now go to Macron and 16 percent to Le Pen.
But that does not mean he has too much security in the desire for the president to be re-elected.
Is considered a genre Outsider The president’s performance in the end of 2017, when he came to power and presented himself as an “anti-organization” figure within the organization, did not please those who expected more stable positions than a charged one, but rather the right-wing.
However he acknowledged that their numbers were not enough to defeat Covid’s-19 and that they had reduced the unemployment rate from 9.6 percent to 7.4 percent when he came to power. GDP recovered faster than other European countries after the worst of the epidemic, and foreign investment increased, despite the liberal-looking reforms that led to the reduction of redundancy costs and cuts in benefits for the unemployed, among other measures that sparked more protests, and his ultimately postponed pension reform. According to it, workers have to work longer years and earn less to retire.
On the other hand, many analysts warn of the danger of confusion with the far-right Marine Le Pen, who softened his speech in an attempt to gain supporters, which changed the name of the political group founded in 2018. Her father, Jean-Marie Leiben. As a result, the far-right National Front will be renamed the National Committee.
But her father’s political heir did not betray her.
During the campaign he talked about jobs, social inequalities and public services, but analysts at CounterPunch digital magazine warn that “Le Pen’s economic perspective is nothing but socialism.”
Thus, in a face-to-face televised discussion with them, Marine Le Pen presented himself as the “Third Way” and declared France’s solidarity in the struggle against insecurity, on the other hand, justifying what Macron was trying to take. Better results amid the epidemic and the conflict now in Ukraine, and promised improvement in everyday life.
The difference between the two shows in the polls is not large. The distance between the actions they perform does not seem so great.
More Stories
Acrylic vs. Must-Have Acrylic Brushes for Perfect Nail Art
Technological Advancements in Tortoise Tracking and Monitoring
Criminal gang in Mykonos encouraged women into prostitution – how they set up romantic dates