Holland: They still don’t understand what happened!

I’ve read almost every analysis on how to do this Geert Wilders He won the election, shocking the European priest and confusing most commentators. Almost all of them analyze his victory in terms of political tactics, downplaying or ignoring the social conditions that contributed to its achievement.

They consider him a prime minister Mark Ruti Adopt it Anti-immigration agenda Wilders unwittingly set the stage not so much for his victory as for its scope. That is, voters preferred a person who had long expressed his views about immigrants and Islam over a person who had recently expressed concerns about immigrants and Islam.

All of those – and they are most of them – who invoke the above-mentioned argument ignore that no politician, the most charismatic, the most communicative, the most demagogic, can impose his agenda if it does not express the concerns, demands, and concerns of a large portion of the people. Community. This is what Geert Wilders did.

The same, even more extreme, policies are not only supported but also implemented by Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, who belongs to the Social Democratic Party. Therefore it cannot be described “far right” For this very reason, few commentators address how Denmark deals with the immigration issue. It is difficult to target a social democrat.

Because adults only European formations They fail to address immigration decisively, leaving room for small, fringe parties to play this role. Because immigration “burns” all European societies, these parties unite. This is the logical conclusion of the prescribed course.

Before they start panicking about her Progressing Ha The extreme right Let them ask themselves about their responsibilities towards this phenomenon. Above all, they should ask themselves why parties with an anti-immigration agenda are also Eurosceptic. Could the inability of the entire EU’s costly bureaucratic system to deal with migration in ways – beyond tried but failed methods – lead to fatal Euroscepticism?

In simple words, important parts of European societies, sometimes strong minorities, sometimes majorities, demand solutions that do not conform to traditional concepts, because they also take into account the religion of the immigrants. They do not want Islamic ghettos with their own laws to exist and flourish within European societies. Adaptation and integration have failed, as evidenced by hundreds of tragic events.

On this board a game will be played European elections to 2024, In most European Union countries. This has already begun to be seen, and no one has the right the next day to say that he fell from the clouds with what he will see.

Note It goes without saying that Europe It’s the house Ours and any other suggestion is speculation. So, as European citizens, we have every reason to want to participate in shaping our own space. There are procedures that allow us to fix what we don’t like. In democracies the majority decides.