to 823,000 Euros in tax evasion Well-known singer Katy Garby was convicted after eight years of court battles. It reached 1.7 million euros with additional fees!
In particular, According to the Sunday edition of the “Proto Thema” newspaperThe singer’s appeal to the courts did not work in her favor, but doubled the interest because she has now lost all legal remedies and must now pay the full amount.
In June 2014, Kaiti Garbi, through her post on her official Facebook page, spoke about what had been said and written about her for not declaring a million euro income to the tax authorities for ten years. .
In her report, Kaity Karby said, among others, that the publications offend every concept of personal data protection, explaining what happened with the SDOE and ultimately “underlining that the publication of her case is a “bubble” of exaggeration and distraction. From the problems of the world and from the problems of the country”.
The singer’s full statement, which she released at the time:
“Today’s publications and written numbers that offend every notion of violation of the protection of personal data, rights of citizens and the law have nothing to do with the truth, I have to say the following: STOE 3 years ago he started an investigation on my tax returns from 2000 to 2010 .Recently several banks asked me to justify within 5 days the movements of my personal accounts for ten years. It is reasonable that a citizen cannot remember, gather evidence and refute the support of SDOE within a short period of time. However, through my lawyers Mr. Petros Kaimagamis and Mr. Efstadio Bagalis I filed a detailed memorandum and rejected the transactions one by one for which I was asked to give reasons.
In the first phase, it was accepted for a very large portion of the verifiable amount per transaction. I firmly believe that I will appeal to the Dispute Resolution Department and Administrative Courts, Article 63a of Law 4174/13, when determining the qualified DOU amount. By not making it “black and white”, based on logic, based on the evidence I present, but based on law, their decision will break the “bubble” of exaggeration and the world’s distraction from its problems. The problems of the country, cases that are not based on people’s interest, due to individual recognition. Proof that the “bread and the show” tactic, with its corresponding human sacrifice, will work out, at least in my case.
However, let’s remember how In July 2018, the administrative court of Athens fined the singer 900,000 euros in her multi-year dispute with the tax office.! The decision by the Administrative Court of Appeals, along with a decision by the Council of State that ruled in 2017, that the Greek government’s limitation of tax evasion cases beyond five years is unconstitutional.
The singer was reportedly censored from 2000 to 2010. In fact, when he was caught by the auditors in 2014, he said in his statement: “About 3 years ago, the SDOE started an investigation related to my tax. From 2000 to 2010. No citizen can remember, collect evidence and deny that he was supported by the SDOE in a short period of time. is logical.”
More Stories
Acrylic vs. Must-Have Acrylic Brushes for Perfect Nail Art
Technological Advancements in Tortoise Tracking and Monitoring
Criminal gang in Mykonos encouraged women into prostitution – how they set up romantic dates