Cameras in Komondoro. We are born Its new leader “radical left”. the Stefanos KasellakisFlamboyant, interventionist, endearing to left-wing people, but also the embodiment of political levity.
The “governor of western Libya,” as he described it, was elected Deutsche WelleOn the occasion of Cavafy’s poem, about a person who spoke Greek “barbarically and sufferingly”, “he was neither deep in thought nor anything.” There is also the most successful German version of TAZ, which described it as “Sunny boy from USA.
And of course the Guardian described it “The 35-year-old underdog He lit up the country’s political landscape in ways that few could have imagined. What once seemed unreal—an American businessman vying to lead a radical force—suddenly becomes very real.
Before the political dimension of today’s elections, which in any case will occupy the political column for a long time, we mention a huge social surprise that has not yet been identified: we do not know whether Greek society has changed to such an extent that it can easily accept, even with enthusiasm, a candidate running an election campaign. And his wife is at his side!
Unless this tolerance towards Kasellakis does not concern Greek society, but only Syriza. The reason may not be progressive tolerance, but rather the apolitical hatred of Mitsotakis, with which the Tsipras period colored the Syriza world. This is if the anti-Mitsuta mentality is what has overcome all the superimposed layers of conservatism added by the centuries, and is not evidence of an open society.
But sociologists will tell us this through serious research, not through popular sociological articles—and we don’t discount ours.
On the political level, the truth comes as an unpleasant surprise: a charismatic man, a real charismatic, with excessive expression and very simplistic political speech, to the point of childishness, without positions and knowledge of political problems, comes and beats and beats anyone. A left-wing party, although its organizational structure was rudimentary, was unable to defend itself against the onslaught of levity.
During the Tsipras era, the party developed into political mush, without moral, political and evaluative standards. Thus they accepted Kasellakis without bothering to liquidate him. Without considering whether it is related to their historical path. It was enough for them that he said that he would defeat Mitsotakis!
Even today, the organizational structure of Syriza, led by Kasellakis, remains headless. He himself will find himself a virtual president of a party that he does not control. It is certain that on his way to the conference he will ensure that the election of his people is organized in a systematic manner. Although the race will be tough, history has shown that leaders always force the people they choose into key positions to tip the tide in their favor.
Of course there are downsides: many of the big names cast alongside him don’t carry much weight in opinion and knowledge. Their political reach is limited to special audiences (see Polakis).
instead of, the umbrella (Regardless of whether one agrees with her or not), she will be extremely cruel as an opposition within the party. Her positions are composed, articulate, and highly political. At the convention, Kasellakis will not have to confront the apolitical followers (including the LGBT community) who voted for him.
The party’s second negative He will be absent from Parliament. On a personal level, it will definitely be beneficial for him, because he will have enough time to undergo a period of intense professional training. Despite his intelligence, he will learn quickly. But when political leaders clash in Parliament, the leader is absent. As an alternative, he will hold “popular evenings.” Meetings, he said, with residents and trade unionists where he would speak in beautiful generalities.
Of course, we do not ignore that he is a “registered” personality in the world. Whether there are defections or not, Syriza will operate as an “alternative Trump” party. The alternative in the field of human rights and Trumpism is in the unmediated relationship between the leader, the people, and party members through the destruction of institutions. He himself confirmed this recently at the conference.
The future is set to be interesting.
More Stories
F-16 crashes in Ukraine – pilot dies due to his own error
Namibia plans to kill more than 700 wild animals to feed starving population
Endurance test for EU-Turkey relations and Ankara with Greece and Cyprus